๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Comparative evaluation of various dissolution apparatus for capsule dosage forms

โœ Scribed by Song-Ling Lin; Johanne Menig; Charles J. Swartz


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1970
Tongue
English
Weight
703 KB
Volume
59
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-3549

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The dissolution profiles of experimental diuretic and antidiabetic compounds in capsules were investigated by bead, plate, blade, holder. basket, disintegration time, and proposed USP dissolution methods. The apparent initial dissolution rate and the extent of drug released within the testing period were used as parameters in comparative evaluation of these seven methods. The influence of the size of the stirrer, the volume of dissolution medium, and the size of screen cloths for making the basket on the dissolution profile was studied and discussed. The Reynolds number of the fluid is introduced to explain the influence of the size of the stirrer on the dissolution rate. Due to the small screen (40 mesh) employed in the proposed USP dissolution method, the visual observation of the behavior of the capsule is impaired, and the chance of clogging the screen by the granules is greater than the self-designed (8 mesh) basket used in the basket method. The dissolution profiles obtained with the disintegration time method provide the fastest rate and the greatest extent of dissolution for both experiemental diuretic and antidiabetic compounds.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Rotating-flask method for dissolution-ra
โœ Howard Weintraub; Milo Gibaldi ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1970 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 522 KB

surface energy lev& of surfaces with only moderate polar forces would result in a very misleading estimate of at least the dispersion forces present in that surface. ## Conclusions It is possible to characterize tablet surfaces according to their CED by using contact-angle data and applying a mod