Here, Philip Bobbitt studies the basis for the legitimacy of judicial review by examining six types of constitutional argument--historical, textual, structural, prudential doctrinal, and ethical--through the unusual method of contrasting sketches of prominent legal figures responding to the consti
Comparative Constitutional Theory
โ Scribed by Gary Jacobsohn, Miguel Schor (eds.)
- Publisher
- Edward Elgar
- Year
- 2018
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 549
- Series
- Research Handbooks in Comparative Constitutional Law
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The need for innovative thinking about alternative constitutional experiences is evident, and readers of Comparative Constitutional Theory will find in its pages a compendium of original, theory-driven essays. The authors use a variety of theoretical perspectives to explore the diversity of global constitutional experience in a post-1989 world prominently marked by momentous transitions from authoritarianism to democracy, by multiple constitutional revolutions and devolutions, by the increased penetration of international law into national jurisdictions, and by the enhancement of supra-national institutions of governance.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This is the first in a four-volume set that provides the definitive account of the major issues of comparative constitutional law in selected Asian jurisdictions. Volume 1 explores the process and contents in the making of a new constitution in each of 19 Asian jurisdictions. The book provides answe
What does it mean to interpret the constitution? Does constitutional interpretation involve moral reasoning, or is legal reasoning something different? What does it mean to say that a limit on a right is justified? How does judicial review fit into a democratic constitutional order? Are attempts to
This volume brings together essays by many of the leading scholars of comparative constitutional design from myriad disciplinary perspectives, including law, philosophy, political science, and economics. The authors collectively assess what we know - and don't know - about the design process as well
This volume brings together essays by many of the leading scholars of comparative constitutional design from myriad disciplinary perspectives, including law, philosophy, political science, and economics. The authors collectively assess what we know - and don't know - about the design process as well