ost empirical work and empirically oriented illustrations dealing with M the hedging effectiveness of futures contracts utilize either one of two approaches, namely: Risk minimization or payoff maximization. In the first approach, hedging is perceived as a combination of a futures position with an e
Commercial banks and interest rate futures: A hedging survey
β Scribed by E. Theodore Veit; Wallace W. Reiff
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1983
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 669 KB
- Volume
- 3
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
ommercial banks keep a significant proportion of their assets in the form of C fixed-income marketable securities (mostly government and municipal securities) that allows them a degree of flexibility to adjust assets quickly in response to changing economic conditions and to provide an important source of income. In 1981, 17% of commercial bank assets were in the form of fixed-income securities (Opper, 1982). To facilitate timely liquidation of these assets in meeting bank credit demand changes, the market value of these assets should be stable, In recent years, price stability has not been a characteristic of bank investment portfolios. The reason for the lack of price stability has been the volatility of market rates of interest caused largely by a combination of inflation and Federal Reserve monetary policy. The volatility of interest rates in recent years is demonstrated by the movement of the market yields on 20-year maturity US. Treasury bonds since 1978. Although the rate in January 1978 was only 8.14%, it had risen to 9.21% by April of 1979. Just one month later the rate had declined 30 basis points to 8.91 % before rising steadily again to 12.49% in February 1980. The rate then declined to 9.89% by May of the same year, only to rise again to 15.13% by September 1981. It then reversed itself dropping to 13.56% in October 1981 before rising 101 basis points in the next two months to 14.57%. By July 1982 the rate had declined once again to 12.91% (Federal Reserve Board).
As a result of the increased interest rate volatility, US.-insured commercial banks realized net securities losses of $225 million in 1978 , $350 million in 1979 , $492 million in 1980 , and $861 million in 1981 (Opper, 1982)). These figures do not indicate the unrealized losses that may also exist.
These losses are signdieant for a number of reasons. Of course they are significant to bank managers who must report them to their stockholders, but they are also important to the public whose confidence in banks is an important element in the functioning of the financial markets. Combining these losses with the fact that commercial banks tend to maintain low equity-to-total-asset ratios has caused concern within the banking community.
By their very nature, commercial banking operations have a close relationship
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
his study is concerned with the effectiveness of GNMA futures as a hedge for T mortgage bankers and other issuers and-holders of mortgage-backed securities. Since the effectiveness of minimum-risk hedge ratios may differ under various financial market conditions, the optimum size of futures position
e development of futures markets in financial instruments has provided fi-T. nancial intermediaries, among others, with a vehicle for hedging against unanticipated changes in interest rates.' Protection against these fluctuations can benefit lending institutions which have exposed themselves to inte
he volatility of interest rates has increased markedly since October of 1979, T leading to a tremendous surge in the volume of trading in interest rate futures. Investigating the effects of the increased volume on the hedging peaormance of futures contracts, Hegde (1982) finds that the hedging effe
## INTEREST RATE FUTURES / 545 work with. Results generated by simulations suggest that unless investors are highly risk averse, discrete futures prices are little different from the continuous ones, implying that either the Chen (1992) or the Cox et al. (1981) futures model should work well for r
CCC 0270-731 41951050573-I 2 'The robustness to conditional heteroskedastic effects and variance shifts is crucial, since, as pointed out by Milonas et al. (1 985), results of futures price dynamics may be biased by variance nonstationarity.