✦ LIBER ✦

Comments on the NIPALS algorithm

✍ Scribed by Yoshikatsu Miyashita; Toshiaki Itozawa; Hiroyuki Katsumi; Shin-Ichi Sasaki

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1990
Tongue: English
Weight: 192 KB
Volume: 4
Category: Article
ISSN: 0886-9383
DOI: 10.1002/cem.1180040111

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comments on the PLS kernel algorithm

✍ Sijmen De Jong; Cajo J. F. Ter Braak 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 355 KB

Lindgren et al. ( J . Chemometrics, 7 , 45-59 (1993)) published a so-called kernel algorithm for PLS regression of Y against X when the number of objects is very large. The algorithm is based solely on deflation of the cross-product matrices XTX, YTY and XTY. The algorithm is now described in a shor

Comments on a simple algorithm for the p

Comments on a simple algorithm for the plotting of contours

✍ Singh, Chandan 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English ⚖ 225 KB

We consider a paper by about a new contour lines algorithm. Because of its exactness and its convincing straightforwardness we have tested it and incorporated it into our postprocessing software. This paper describes some aspects we experienced during the numerical experimentation which may be help

Comments on Mohr and Henderson's path co

Comments on Mohr and Henderson's path consistency algorithm

✍ Ching-Chih Han; Chia-Hoang Lee 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 216 KB

## Mohr and Henderson have presented new algorithms for arc and path consistency in [1] . Though the underlying ideas of their algorithms are correct, the path consistency algorithm PC-3 is in error. In this paper we point out the errors in this algorithm and give a correct one. The time comple

Comments on ‘non-convergence of the appr

Comments on ‘non-convergence of the approximate maximum likelihood identification algorithm’

✍ Lennart Ljung 📂 Article 📅 1980 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 130 KB

The following three comments and claims are made: 1. The 'approximate maximum likelihood method ' [called RELS in (S6derstr6m et al., 1978)] may work well in applications even though it has been proven that it does not always converge. 2. It was incorrect in (\* Ljung et al., 1975) to call the 'si

Comments on "a Reliable Algorithm for So

Comments on "a Reliable Algorithm for Solving Frequency Equations Involving Transcendental Functions"

✍ S. Naguleswaran 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 118 KB

Author's reply to comments on ‘non-conve

Author's reply to comments on ‘non-convergence of the approximate maximum likelihood identification algorithm’

✍ V. Panuska 📂 Article 📅 1980 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 57 KB