✦ LIBER ✦

Comments on “extension of kirchhoff's formula to radiation from moving surfaces”

✍ Scribed by D.L. Hawkings

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1989
Tongue: English
Weight: 70 KB
Volume: 133
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-460X
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(89)90995-4

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comments on “Extension of Kirchhoff's fo

Comments on “Extension of Kirchhoff's formula to radiation from moving surfaces”: (by F. Farassat and M. K. Myers, Journal of Sound and Vibration123(3), 451–460)

✍ D.L. Hawkings 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 65 KB

Chebyshev finite difference method for t

Chebyshev finite difference method for the effects of variable viscosity and variable thermal conductivity on heat transfer from moving surfaces with radiation

✍ Elsayed M.E Elbarbary; Nasser S Elgazery 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 French ⚖ 399 KB

In this article, we studied the effects of variable viscosity and variable thermal conductivity on heat transfer from moving surfaces in a micropolar fluid through a porous medium with radiation. The fluid viscosity is assumed to vary as an inverse linear function of temperature and the thermal cond

Reply to the comments of L. Ter-Minassia

Reply to the comments of L. Ter-Minassian-Saraga on the paper “characterization of silica surfaces by adsorption from solution,” by B. H. Bijsterbosch

✍ B.H Bijsterbosch 📂 Article 📅 1975 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 100 KB

Reply to “comments on ‘absorbed energy d

Reply to “comments on ‘absorbed energy distribution from radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation in a mammalian cell model: Effect of membrane-bound water’ by Liu and Cleary”

✍ Li-Ming Liu; Stephen F. Cleary 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 62 KB 👁 1 views

We thank Dr. Balzano and Dr. Sheppard for indicating that the SAR units in Tables 234567, and on the last line of p. 170 of our article should be "(mW/kg)" rather than "(W/kg)." As they noted, this typographical error did not occur in the figures and obviously did not affect our interpretation of th