Comments are made on the data reported by Kfogensen, Pedersen and Anderson on positron reactions with pseudo-halide ions in water and on their interpretation. Although some of our previous experimental curves are in agreement with theirs there is a major discrepancy with some of their semiempiriul d
Comment reply to comment on the positron reactions with pseudo-halides in water
โ Scribed by O.E. Mogensen; N.J. Pedersen; J.R. Andersen
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1983
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 247 KB
- Volume
- 98
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-2614
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The hydntcd pos~on c& rexlIons wrth SCN-, OCN-, CN-, S'-, and SH-wcrc studrcd by mc.ms of the .mgular corrchtron tcchmque. The posllron forms bound stales with SCN-. CN-. and S'rcactron wlih SH-results in a pos&on bound state with S'-. but no1 with OCN-. App~~lly, lhc e& It was dlfficull to dctcrmmc
This Reply clarifies the similarities and differences between our work and that of Gadre et al. in computing ab initio molecular electrostatic potentials. The principal advance described by us was to cast the PRISM algorithm for two-electron repulsion integrals in a form suitable for the calculation
Table of our paper showing calculated ionization energies of Fe, Ru and OS is given with correction. It is emphasized that the energy characteristics calculated using a pseudo-potential should be compared with other pseudo-potential or all-electron values calculated with a comparable basis set.