✦ LIBER ✦

Comment on ‘Stapp's theorem without counterfactual commitment’

✍ Scribed by Henry P. Stapp

Book ID: 116066477
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1994
Tongue: English
Weight: 400 KB
Volume: 25
Category: Article
ISSN: 0039-3681
DOI: 10.1016/0039-3681(94)90070-1

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A theorem on multi-period insurance cont

A theorem on multi-period insurance contracts without commitment

✍ Francisco J. Vázquez; R. Watt 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 70 KB

In a multi-period setting that is equivalent to the classic Rothschild-Stiglitz adverse selection situation, we prove that if insurers do not gather information on accidents over time, then the inability to commit to contract renewals is sufficient for the optimal contract sequence to be periodic re

Comment on “the rastall model and Stapp'

Comment on “the rastall model and Stapp's proof of nonlocality”

✍ Henry P. Stapp 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 166 KB

Comments on “determinism, realism, and S

Comments on “determinism, realism, and Stapp's 1985 proof of nonlocality”

✍ Frederick Fellows 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 270 KB

A Comment on Parrott’s Theorem

✍ Nævdal, Geir 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 🌐 English ⚖ 420 KB

Comment on Anderson's comment and on the

Comment on Anderson's comment and on the correlation theorem

✍ V.L Bonch-Bruevich 📂 Article 📅 1971 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 165 KB

Moral commitment without objectivity or

Moral commitment without objectivity or illusion: Comments on Ruse and Woolcock

✍ Bruce N. Waller 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 584 KB

Peter Woolcock, in "Ruse's Darwinian Meta-Ethics: A Critique", argues that the subjectivist (nonobjectivist) Darwinian metaethics proposed by Michael Ruse (in "Taking Darwin Seriously") cannot work, because the "illusion of objectivity" that Ruse claims is essential to morality breaks down when it i