𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comment on Anderson's comment and on the correlation theorem

✍ Scribed by V.L Bonch-Bruevich

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1971
Tongue
English
Weight
165 KB
Volume
35
Category
Article
ISSN
0375-9601

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comment on β€œComment on Dunning's correla
Comment on β€œComment on Dunning's correlation-consistent basis sets”
✍ Ernest R. Davidson πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 244 KB

By using a general linear transformation of Dunning's contracted basis set, the contraction length can be reduced even more than noted in the Comment by Hashimoto et al. With GAUSSIAN 94, this results in a considerable savings in computer time. If one is willing to neglect small coefficients, even g

Comment on Anderson and Dorwart paper
Comment on Anderson and Dorwart paper
✍ Arnold L. Katz πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1984 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 99 KB πŸ‘ 1 views
Comments on the Nucleation Theorem
Comments on the Nucleation Theorem
✍ JΓΌrn W.P. Schmelzer πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 154 KB

A critical analysis of the nucleation theorem in its different formulations is presented. A new formulation of the nucleation theorem, mathematically widely equivalent to the form given by Oxtoby and Kashchiev in 1994, is developed. This formulation is, however, more easily applicable to the interpr

Comment on Dunning's correlation-consist
Comment on Dunning's correlation-consistent basis sets
✍ T. Hashimoto; K. Hirao; H. Tatewaki πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 196 KB

The contraction in Dunning's correlation-consistent basis sets follows the original Raffenetti approach that uses (a) occupied SCF orbitals plus (b) uncontracted primitives. Without any loss of energy, (b) can be excluded from (a), leading to substantial savings of CPU times for integral-limited com