𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comment on Assessing marginal impact of investment on the performance of organisational units

✍ Scribed by O.B Olesen; N.C Petersen


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
153 KB
Volume
39
Category
Article
ISSN
0925-5273

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The impact of self-assessment on provide
✍ Edward Kelley; Allison Gamble Kelley; Cheick H. T. Simpara; Ousmane SidibΓ©; Mart πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 72 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Improving the quality of clinical care in developing country settings is a difficult task, both in public sector settings where supervision is infrequent and in private sector settings where supervision and certification are non‐existent. This study tested a low‐cost method, self‐assess

A theoretical assessment of the empirica
✍ Jean-FranΓ§ois Hennart πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English βš– 155 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract I assess the theoretical basis for the existence of a relationship between the size of a firm's foreign footprint (its multinationality) and its performance. I argue that multinationality results from a firm's choice between coordinating internally the stages of its value chain and lett

Assessing the impact of organizational l
✍ M. JosΓ© Garrido; Carmen Camarero πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 169 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Product innovation, technological innovation and organizational innovations are the key to helping cultural organizations achieve their social mission and achieve efficiency. This innovation strategy and the outcomes depend on introducing learning orientation into the organization. The

On Assessing the Performance of Randomiz
✍ Sorana Froda πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 145 KB

In this paper we study randomized algorithms with random input. We adapt to such algorithms the notion of probability of a false positive which is common in epidemiological studies. The probability of a false positive takes into account both the (controlled) error of the randomization and the random