✦ LIBER ✦

Comment on ‘A political economy of accounting standard setting’: a reply

✍ Scribed by Roland Königsgruber

Publisher: Springer US
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 87 KB
Volume: 15
Category: Article
ISSN: 1385-3457
DOI: 10.1007/s10997-011-9177-2

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comment on ‘A political economy of accou

Comment on ‘A political economy of accounting standard setting’

✍ Kees Camfferman; Stephen A. Zeff 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 130 KB

A political economy of accounting standa

A political economy of accounting standard setting

✍ Roland Königsgruber 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 393 KB

A study of accounting standard-setting u

A study of accounting standard-setting using graph theory

✍ Kensuke Ogata 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Springer Japan 🌐 English ⚖ 331 KB

Reply to comment on “A possible definiti

Reply to comment on “A possible definition of basis set superposition error”

✍ Ernest R. Davidson; Subhas J. Chakravorty 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 226 KB

Contrary to the statements of Gutowski et al., the difference between the true dissociation energy and the counterpoisecorrected calculation of the dissociation energy is shown to be entirely a non-additive correction for basis set incompleteness.

95/05665 A comment on the paper by Kym A

95/05665 A comment on the paper by Kym Anderson — the political economy of coal subsidies in Europe

📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 183 KB

The structural setting of the main doneg

The structural setting of the main donegal granite; a reply to comments on a recent interpretation

✍ D. H. W. Hutton 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 198 KB

I thank Dr. Berger for his comments on an earlier paper of mine (Hutton 1977) and welcome this opportunity to clarify and expand on various aspects of that work. Berger (1980) has divided the Creeslough Formation in its type area into a lower 'calcareous' unit (occurring in the SE) and an upper pel