𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Reply to comment on “A possible definition of basis set superposition error”

✍ Scribed by Ernest R. Davidson; Subhas J. Chakravorty

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
226 KB
Volume
241
Category
Article
ISSN
0009-2614

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Contrary to the statements of Gutowski et al., the difference between the true dissociation energy and the counterpoisecorrected calculation of the dissociation energy is shown to be entirely a non-additive correction for basis set incompleteness.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A possible definition of basis set super
A possible definition of basis set superposition error
✍ Ernest R. Davidson; Subhas J. Chakravorty 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 636 KB

A new definition is suggested for basis set superposition error, Other sources of basis set incompleteness error in the interaction energy are considered. Comparison is made with the counterpoise correction. An explanation is provided for the tendency in water and HF dimers for the counterpoise-corr

Reply to Comment on “Segmented contracti
Reply to Comment on “Segmented contractions of relativistic Gaussian basis sets”
✍ Osamu Matsuoka 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 56 KB

It is pointed out that my arguments on the effects of contractions of the relativistic basis sets on the total energies are made in the sense of the absolute magnitude while Ishikawa's are made in the sense of the relative magnitude. Hence they do not contradict each other.

A comparison of the behavior of function
A comparison of the behavior of functional/basis set combinations for hydrogen-bonding in the water dimer with emphasis on basis set superposition error
✍ Joshua A. Plumley; J. J. Dannenberg 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 107 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract We evaluate the performance of ten functionals (B3LYP, M05, M05‐2X, M06, M06‐2X, B2PLYP, B2PLYPD, X3LYP, B97D, and MPWB1K) in combination with 16 basis sets ranging in complexity from 6‐31G(d) to aug‐cc‐pV5Z for the calculation of the H‐bonded water dimer with the goal of defining which

The structural setting of the main doneg
The structural setting of the main donegal granite; a reply to comments on a recent interpretation
✍ D. H. W. Hutton 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 198 KB

I thank Dr. Berger for his comments on an earlier paper of mine (Hutton 1977) and welcome this opportunity to clarify and expand on various aspects of that work. Berger (1980) has divided the Creeslough Formation in its type area into a lower 'calcareous' unit (occurring in the SE) and an upper pel