𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Collateral effects of behavioral parent training on families of children with developmental disabilities and behavior disorders

✍ Scribed by Maurice A. Feldman; Shannon E. Werner


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
69 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
1072-0847

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Development of a parent training program
✍ Cynthia R. Johnson; Benjamin L. Handen; Eric Butter; Ann Wagner; James Mulick; D 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 179 KB

## Abstract Parent delivered interventions based on applied behavior analysis (ABA) for children with Pervasive Developmental Disorders (PDDs) have been evaluated using primarily single‐subject design methodology or small case series. While the results of these evaluations are encouraging, an impor

Effects of parent training on parent and
✍ Bethany A. Marcus; Victoria Swanson; Timothy R. Vollmer 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 172 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract We evaluated the effects of parent training for four children whose aberrant behaviors were maintained by social positive or negative reinforcement. Interventions were based on the behavioral function of the problem behavior. Child participants were four children (ages 3 to 5 years) who

The effects of general-case training and
✍ John Ward-Horner; Peter Sturmey 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 171 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract One concern with training discrete‐trial teaching (DTT) is the generalization of teaching skills. This study employed behavioral skills and general‐case training to train three parents to conduct DTT. A multiple‐baseline‐across‐participants‐experimental design assessed the effects of pa

The effects of reinforcer choice on rate
✍ Richard B. Graff; Myrna E. Libby; Gina Green 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 352 KB 👁 2 views

A multielement design was used to evaluate the eects of three reinforcement conditions on the free-operant and challenging responses of two individuals with severe disabilities. Preference assessments identi®ed three stimuli that could function as reinforcers for each participant. Reinforcers were d