If G is a claw-free graph, then there is a graph cl(G) such that (i) G is a spanning subgraph of cl(G), (ii) cl(G) is a line graph of a triangle-free graph, and (iii) the length of a longest cycle in G and in cl(G) is the same. A sufficient condition for hamiltonicity in claw-free graphs, the equiv
Closure concepts for claw-free graphs
✍ Scribed by H.J. Broersma; H. Trommel
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 404 KB
- Volume
- 185
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-365X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
In the class of k-connected claw-free graphs, we study the stability of some Hamiltonian properties under a closure operation introduced by the third author. We prove that (i) the properties of pancyclicity, vertex pancyclicity and cycle extendability are not stable for any k (i.e., for any of these
In this article, we study cycle coverings and 2-factors of a claw-free graph and those of its closure, which has been defined by the first author (On a closure concept in claw-free graphs, J Combin Theory Ser B 70 (1997), 217-224). For a claw-free graph G and its closure cl(G), we prove: ( 1 (2) G
## Abstract We say that __G__ is almost claw‐free if the vertices that are centers of induced claws (__K__~1,3~) in __G__ are independent and their neighborhoods are 2‐dominated. Clearly, every claw‐free graph is almost claw‐free. It is shown that (i) every even connected almost claw‐free graph has
A graph G is quasi claw-free if it satisfies the property: This property is satisfied if in particular u does not center a claw (induced K1.3). Many known results on claw-free graphs, dealing with matching and hamiltonicity are extended to the larger class of quasi-claw-free graphs.
## Abstract The circular chromatic number of a graph is a well‐studied refinement of the chromatic number. Circular‐perfect graphs form a superclass of perfect graphs defined by means of this more general coloring concept. This article studies claw‐free circular‐perfect graphs. First, we prove that