𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Clinical Trial of Penicillamine in Rheumatoid Arthritis

✍ Scribed by Norman O. Rothermich; Marvin H. Thomas; Vol K. Phillips; Waldemar Bergen


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1981
Tongue
English
Weight
532 KB
Volume
24
Category
Article
ISSN
0004-3591

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The medical records of our first 200 consecutive rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with penicillamine were analyzed retrospectively. All but 5 patients (97.5%) had undergone earlier chrysotherapy that resulted in either therapeutic failure or toxicity. Only 57 patients (28.5%) were still receiving penicillamine on January 1, 1981, and the duration of therapy ranged from 23 to 62 months. The dropout rate due to toxicity, therapeutic failure, relapse, or other reasons was very high (71.5%). Toxic effects required permanent discontinuance in 56 patients (28%). Therapy was discontinued for 36 patients (18%) because of no benefit. A striking number (20) had relapse after therapeutic success and while continuing to take penicillamine, and the therapy had to be discontinued, a relapse rate of 10%. Therapy for the remaining 15.5% was discontinued for miscellaneous reasons that were not related to penicillamine per se: patient anxiety (6%), lost to followup (5%), hospitalization for reasons unrelated to penicillamine therapy (2%), lack of cooperation and study protocol (1% each), or pregnancy (0.5%). By our criteria, 142 patients (71%) received benefit (remission or improvement). Therapy results for these patients were as follows: still on penicillamine on January 1, 1981 (28.5%); no longer receiving the drug due to toxicity (19.5%); no longer receiving penicillamine due to relapse while on continuing therapy (10%); no longer receiving penicillamine due to miscellaneous reasons not related to penicillamine therapy (13%). This study shows that penicillamine is a valuable drug in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, but its value in clinical practice is limited by a rather high incidence of both toxicity and relapse during treatment.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


D-Penicillamine in rheumatoid arthritis
✍ Dr. Jack Zuckner; Robert H. Ramsey; Robert W. Dorner; George E. Gantner Jr πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1970 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 494 KB πŸ‘ 1 views
Controlled multicenter trial of tioproni
✍ Giampiero Pasero; Pietro Pellegrini; Umberto Ambanelli; Maria Laura Ciompi; Vinc πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1982 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 692 KB

## Abstract Fifty‐seven patients took part in a controlled double‐blind trial between tiopronin and D‐penicillamine as basic treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Thirty‐nine (19 receiving tiopronin, 20 receiving D‐penicillamine) completed the trial after 1 year. Both drugs resulted in a decrease of

D-penicillamine in the treatment of rheu
✍ Ian K. Tsang; Caroline A. Patterson; Howard B. Stein; Harold S. Robinson; Denys πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1977 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 338 KB πŸ‘ 3 views