Chromosomal breakpoints characterization of two supernumerary ring chromosomes 20
✍ Scribed by N. Guediche; S. Brisset; J.-J. Benichou; N. Guérin; P. Mabboux; M.-L. Maurin; C. Bas; M. Laroudie; O. Picone; D. Goldszmidt; S. Prévot; P. Labrune; G. Tachdjian
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 246 KB
- Volume
- 152A
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1552-4825
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The occurrence of an additional ring chromosome 20 is a rare chromosome abnormality, and no common phenotype has been yet described. We report on two new patients presenting with a supernumerary ring chromosome 20 both prenatally diagnosed. The first presented with intrauterine growth retardation and some craniofacial dysmorphism, and the second case had a normal phenotype except for obesity. Conventional cytogenetic studies showed for each patient a small supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC). Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, these SMCs corresponded to ring chromosomes 20 including a part of short and long arms of chromosome 20. Detailed molecular cytogenetic characterization showed different breakpoints (20p11.23 and 20q11.23 for Patient 1 and 20p11.21 and 20q11.21 for Patient 2) and sizes of the two ring chromosomes 20 (13.6 Mb for case 1 and 4.8 Mb for case 2). Review of the 13 case reports of an extra r(20) ascertained postnatally (8 cases) and prenatally (5 cases) showed varying degrees of phenotypic abnormalities. We document a detailed molecular cytogenetic chromosomal breakpoints characterization of two cases of supernumerary ring chromosomes 20. These results emphasize the need to characterize precisely chromosomal breakpoints of supernumerary ring chromosomes 20 in order to establish genotype–phenotype correlation. This report may be helpful for prediction of natural history and outcome, particularly in prenatal diagnosis. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
A small supernumerary chromosome was observed in two Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) patients. The clinical diagnosis of PWS was confirmed by the ascertainment of the deletion of region 15q11-13 in one case and uniparental disomy (UPD) of the same region in the other. The markers were negative for dysta
Marker chromosomes present a problem in genetic counseling because there are often no clear phenotype-karyotype correlations. We present the clinical findings in a patient who is mosaic for a supernumerary marker chromosome 20 determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and compare these