Chromatographic competitive binding immunoassays: a comparison of the sequential and simultaneous injection methods
β Scribed by Mary Anne Nelson; Wanda S. Reiter; David S. Hage
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 191 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0269-3879
- DOI
- 10.1002/bmc.241
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Two approaches for performing competitive binding immunoassays by HPLC and other flowβbased systems are the simultaneous and sequential injection methods. Both these techniques make use of a column with a limited amount of antibody, onto which is injected a sample and a fixed amount of a labeled analyte analog. An indirect measure of the unlabeled analyte in the sample is then obtained by looking at the amount of analog in either the nonretained or retained peaks. In the simultaneous injection mode, the sample and labeled analog are applied at the same time to the column, while in the sequential mode the sample is injected first, followed by the analog. This results in a difference in the analytical characteristics of these two approaches. This study used chromatographic theory and previous data obtained for injections of human serum albumin (HSA) onto an antiβHSA antibody column to compare the response, detection limits, range, and sensitivity of these methods. Under equivalent conditions, it was found that the sequential method always provided the best lower limit of detection and sensitivity. However, the simultaneous mode had a broader dynamic range and higher upper limit of detection. From these observations, several guidelines were developed regarding the use and selection of such assays for new applications. Copyright Β© 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The present study extended the literature on feeding disorders by conducting a comparison of sequential and simultaneous food presentation in the treatment of food selectivity. In the simultaneous condition, a highly preferred food was presented in the same bite with a nonβpreferred foo
## Acknowledgements The authors thank the Upjohn Co., Kalamazm, Mich.. for the generous supplies of tolbutamide. One of the authors (P. M.) gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Delegation Generale Recherche Sciences et Techniques (Paris, France).
## Abstract ## Background and Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the complications and functional outcome associated with the use of an irradiated allograftβimplant composite or a boneβingrowth modular tumor prosthesis for replacement of the knee joint after resection of a bone sa