๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Causes of Failure of Ceramic-on-Ceramic and Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties

โœ Scribed by Manny Porat; Javad Parvizi; Peter F. Sharkey; Keith R. Berend; Adolph V. Lombardi; Robert L. Barrack

Book ID
107564383
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
251 KB
Volume
470
Category
Article
ISSN
0009-921X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Serum ion levels after ceramic-on-cerami
Serum ion levels after ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: 8-year minimum follow-up
โœ Lucia Savarino; Giovanni Padovani; Massimo Ferretti; Michelina Greco; Elisabetta ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 142 KB

## Abstract Alternative bearing surfaces for total hip arthroplasty, such as metalโ€onโ€metal and ceramicโ€onโ€ceramic, offer the potential to reduce mechanical wear and osteolysis. In the short and medium term, the second generation of metalโ€onโ€metal bearings demonstrated high systemic metal ion level

Ceramic-on-ceramic vs. metal-on-metal in
Ceramic-on-ceramic vs. metal-on-metal in total hip arthroplasty (THA): do 36-mm diameters exhibit comparable wear performance?
โœ M. Spinelli; S. Affatato; A. Corvi; M. Viceconti ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 143 KB

## Abstract Hardโ€onโ€hard hip implants were thought as a solution to wear problems affecting polyethylene. Alumina ceramic and metal articulations are harder, biocompatible, and result in reduced wear and particles to the surrounding tissue. Alumina ceramic hip implants produce lower wear rates than