โ Scribed by Harpster, Linda Marie
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
Plaintiff filed a medical malpractice action against the hospital and against her physicians. During discovery, she requested several documents from the hospital, which the hospital objected to on the grounds that those items were privileged under state statute. The statute the hospital relied on provided that the proceedings and records of peer review committees are confidential and not subject to discovery or introduction into evidence in any civil action arising out of the evaluation and review by such committee. Plaintiff first requested all incident reports ever filed concerning the defendant physicians. In addition to claiming privilege under the statute, the hospital said the request was overbroad and that it sought information not reasonably calculated to lead to evidence that would be admissible at trial.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Hospital Publishing, Inc., a subsidiary of the American Hospital Association. For many years, the society had hoped to develop a text for professionals new to the field of health care risk management. In January 1988, the ASHRM Communication and Resources Committee formed a task force to plan the b
## Case law update state plan for medical assistance would not be required, by virtue of that desire, to adhere to the law's requirements. Of course, the same provider may be bound by the law if it participates in Medicare.