## Abstract Contrast between tagged and nontagged myocardium was investigated using rapid gradient echo segmented k‐space CINE MRI. The transient behavior of magnetization was measured in stationary and moving phantoms using gradient recalled acquisition in steady‐state __GRASS__ and spoiled __GRAS
Cardiac Tagging with Breath-Hold Cine MRI
✍ Scribed by Elliot R. McVeigh; Ergin Atalar
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 821 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0740-3194
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A method is presented for measuring myocardial deformation in a breath‐hold with tagged cine MRI. Tagged cine images of human hearts are obtained in arbitrary oblique planes on a standard imager with as few as four heartbeats. The scan time has been reduced 16‐ to 64‐fold from previous techniques.© 1992 Academic Press,Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Purpose To correct for spatial misregistration of multi‐breath‐hold short‐axis (SA), two‐chamber (2CH), and four‐chamber (4CH) cine cardiac MR (CMR) images caused by respiratory and patient motion. ## Materials and Methods Twenty CMR studies from consecutive patients with separate
## Abstract The reproducibility of a semiautomated method of volumetric analysis allowing estimates of left ventricular (LV) parameters in approximately 5 minutes of analysis time is reported. Twenty normal volunteers underwent cine breath‐hold cardiac MRI on two occasions with two observers using
## Abstract ## Purpose To develop and validate a three‐dimensional (3D) single breath‐hold, projection reconstruction (PR), balanced steady state free precession (SSFP) method for cardiac function evaluation against a two‐dimensional (2D) multislice Fourier (Cartesian) transform (FT) SSFP method.
## Abstract In 24 patients presenting with 55 renal lesions (mean size, 20.8 mm), single‐breath‐hold (SBH) fast spin‐echo (FSE) techniques allowing T1 and T2 images to be produced within 20 and 23 sec, respectively, were compared with routine non‐breath‐hold (NBH) spin‐echo (SE) T1 and NBH‐FSE T2 s