𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Brand orientation in the charity sector: a framework for discussion and research

✍ Scribed by Philippa Hankinson


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
184 KB
Volume
6
Category
Article
ISSN
1465-4520

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Some charity organisations are turning to charity brand status, not only in terms of a name and logo but more importantly in terms of communicating value and meaning to their stakeholders. Brand orientation is described in this paper as the extent to which charity organisations regard themselves as brands, an indication of how much (or how little) organisations accept the theory and practice of branding. Through literature‐based and field‐based research, this paper examines the nature of brand orientation in the charity sector. A conceptual framework of brand orientation is proposed with antecedent factors which may augment or diminish levels of brand orientation and consequences which may follow its adoption. A number of research propositions are put forward which constitute both a framework for discussion and a research agenda for the charity sector. Copyright Β© 2001 Henry Stewart Publications


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The psychology of deception in marketing
✍ Ram N. Aditya πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 163 KB

## Abstract The Federal Trade Commission's current policy statements on deceptive and unfair marketing practices are predicated primarily on economic considerations, ignoring the broader ramifications of trade policy for society as well as specific considerations with regard to the individual consu

Transcending the Quantitative-Qualitativ
✍ Charles L. McLafferty Jr.; John R. Slate; Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› American Counseling Association 🌐 English βš– 263 KB

Quantitative research dominates published literature in the helping professions. Mixed methods research, which integrates quantitative and qualitative methodologies, has received a lukewarm reception. The authors address the iterative separation that infuses theory, praxis, philosophy, methodology,