Hubert Dreyfus claims that "symbolic AI" is a "degenerating research program", i.e. is not making progress. It's hard to see how he would know, since he makes no claim to have read much of the recent literature. In defending "symbolic AI", I shall concentrate on just one part of symbolic AI-the log
โฆ LIBER โฆ
Body and world: a review of What Computers Still Can't Do: A critique of artificial reason (Hubert L. Dreyfus): (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992); liii + 354 pages, $13.95
โ Scribed by John Haugeland
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 759 KB
- Volume
- 80
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0004-3702
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Hubert Dreyfus, what computers still can
โ
John McCarthy
๐
Article
๐
1996
๐
Elsevier Science
๐
English
โ 610 KB
Of Hubert Dreyfus and dead horses: some
โ
Timothy Koschmann
๐
Article
๐
1996
๐
Elsevier Science
๐
English
โ 1007 KB
The thing to do with a dead horse is to bury it as expeditiously as possible." Anonymous Seven years ago I reviewed one of Dreyfus' earlier books on computers and cognition [22]. My position at that time was that Dreyfus' critique of AI appeared ill-informed. His arguments for why AI, as a research