𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Blood flow in the lower limb after balloon angioplasty of the superficial femoral artery

✍ Scribed by Mr S. T. Hussain; R. E. Smith; A. L. Clark; R. F. M. Wood


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
458 KB
Volume
83
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1323

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Using duplex ultrasonography lower-limb blood flow measurements were obtained in 20 patients with intermittent claudication. Assessments of flow were made in the common femoral artery, profunda femoris artery (PFA) and superficial femoral artery (SFA) before and after angioplasty for stenoses of short segments of the SFA. Blood flow was measured at rest and after exercise on a cycle ergometer. Collateral flow was calculated using an established mathematical model. Results were compared with the ankle: brachial systolic pressure index (ABPI) after exercise. Although there was no overall increase in resting limb blood flow, an increase in mean(s.d.) SFA flow from 148(79) to 312(94) ml minβˆ’1, with a concomitant decrease in PFA flow from 224(84) to 98(43) ml minβˆ’1 was noted 1 week after angioplasty (P<0Β·05). At rest there was an increase in mean(s.d.) ABPI from 0Β·62(0Β·12) to 0Β·89(0Β·23) (P<0Β·05). Collateral flow was estimated to have decreased from 186(34) to 18(8) ml minβˆ’1; the pattern of change in flow was similar after exercise. Angioplasty of the SFA remains controversial because of the risk of restenosis. The above methodology allows assessment of whether patients can re-establish collateral flow or whether limb blood flow will be significantly compromised if restenosis occurs.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of impedance and strain gauge
✍ I. G. Schraibman; D. Mott; G. P. Naylor; D. Charlesworth πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1975 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 299 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Simultaneous measurement of the flow of blood in the calf in 24 normal volunteers by impedance and mercury strain gauge plethysmography has revealed a systematic difference in the results from the two methods. Possible reasons for this discrepancy are discussed.