LDPE/PA6 binary blends and LDPE/PA6/compatibilizer ternary blends were prepared in a Brabender extruder, equipped with a prototype static mixer. Compatibility of the components was estimated by rheological properties (viscosity and a melt flow index), and observations of the structure were made with
Blends of i-PP and SBS. II. Influence of in situ compatibilization on the mechanical properties
✍ Scribed by Helena Maria Wilhelm; Maria Isabel Felisberti
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 111 KB
- Volume
- 87
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-8995
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
This article concerns the in situ compatibilization of immiscible isotatic polypropylene/styrene–butadiene–styrene triblock copolymer blends (i‐PP/SBS) by use of a reactive mixture. For this purpose, maleated PP (PP–MAH) and SBS (SBS–MAH) were used as functionalized polymers and 4,4′‐diaminediphenylmethane was used as a coupling agent between maleated polymers, resulting in a graft copolymer. Binary blends of i‐PP/SBS, nonreactive ternary blends of i‐PP/PP–MAH/SBS, and reactive ternary blends of i‐PP/PP–MAH/SBS–MAH with varying diamine/anhydride molar ratios were prepared. The mechanical properties of the blends were determined by tensile and impact‐resistance tests. The optimum improvement in the mechanical properties was found when the diamine/anhydride molar ratio in the ternary reactive blends was 0.5/1. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 87: 516–522, 2003
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Low‐density polyethylene/polyamide 6 (LDPE/PA6) blends were __in situ__ formed by reactive extrusion, in which __in situ__ polymerization of ε‐caprolactam (CL) and __in situ__ copolymerization of maleic anhydride grafted low‐density polyethylene (LDPE‐MA) and CL took place simultaneousl
Young's modulus and tensile strength of nanocomposites containing 10 wt.-% of C12A compatibilized with DDS (wt.-% with respect
In a more elaborate article, it was described that blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), a liquid crystalline copolyester, and small amounts of a liquid crystalline polyhydroxyether showed an increase in tensile modulus and strength compared to the blends without polyhydroxyether. The result