I really feel sorry for the theists and their empty attempts to extract reason from unreasonable arguments. This book is a long list of logical fallacies clearly written by the author, for the author, in an attempt to convince/brainwash himself into believing the stupidity proposed. This kind of bo
Blasting The Foundations of Atheism, its Pseudoscience and Pseudo-reason : Answering Richard Dawkins’ (The God Delusion)
✍ Scribed by AbulFeda’ Ibn Mass’oud
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 446
- Edition
- Second
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Answering Richard Dawkins' (The God Delusion)
✦ Table of Contents
Blasting the foundations of atheism Volume 1- Second Edition......Page 1
introduction......Page 5
chapter one......Page 17
chapter two......Page 167
epilogue......Page 438
contents......Page 445
✦ Subjects
Atheism; Islam; Richard Dawkins; God;
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The essential book for dismantling Richard Dawkins' atheistic agenda. Scott Hahn and Benjamin Wiker collaborate to debunk Dawkins' theories and show how inconsistent and illogical his conclusions truly are. This is the definitive book for college students or faithful Christians hoping to answer Dawk
First Edition of this book is a revelation in the field of research and analyzation of a bestseller on an intriguing topic denying the existence of God and instead calling it a “Delusion”. This book deals with the arguments presented in two manners i.e. Philosophical and Scientific. The Author encou
Richard Dawkins, biologist and best-selling author, claims that belief in God is a "delusion" and that "religion" harms society. Dawkins contends that he has reason and evidence on his side, and he dismisses faith as unfounded, even irrational.<p> Dominican Thomas Crean tackles Dawkins' claims head-
Richard Dawkins, biologist and best-selling author, claims that belief in God is a “delusion” and that “religion” harms society. Dawkins contends that he has reason and evidence on his side, and he dismisses faith as unfounded, even irrational. Dominican Thomas Crean tackles Dawkins’ claims head-on