Richard Dawkins, biologist and best-selling author, claims that belief in God is a "delusion" and that "religion" harms society. Dawkins contends that he has reason and evidence on his side, and he dismisses faith as unfounded, even irrational.<p> Dominican Thomas Crean tackles Dawkins' claims head-
ATHEISM IS FALSE Richard Dawkins And The Improbability Of God Delusion
β Scribed by David Reuben Stone
- Publisher
- Lulu.com
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 6
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
I really feel sorry for the theists and their empty attempts to extract reason from unreasonable arguments. This book is a long list of logical fallacies clearly written by the author, for the author, in an attempt to convince/brainwash himself into believing the stupidity proposed.
This kind of book--and the reviews that follow it, all [coincidentally] by fundamentalist theists--make you want to lose faith in humanity and our capacity to reason.
I'm glad I didn't buy it (it was lent to me by a christian friend), and you shouldn't either. If you want to indulge your curiosity, try to find it somewhere for free (library perhaps?). It would be more useful if instead of paperback it came in toilet paper format.
FYI, I had to add 1 star because Amazon won't let me post the review with 0.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Richard Dawkins, biologist and best-selling author, claims that belief in God is a βdelusionβ and that βreligionβ harms society. Dawkins contends that he has reason and evidence on his side, and he dismisses faith as unfounded, even irrational. Dominican Thomas Crean tackles Dawkinsβ claims head-on
Answering Richard Dawkins' (The God Delusion)
First Edition of this book is a revelation in the field of research and analyzation of a bestseller on an intriguing topic denying the existence of God and instead calling it a βDelusionβ. This book deals with the arguments presented in two manners i.e. Philosophical and Scientific. The Author encou
MacGrath might have tried to take advantage of those critique-grounds that are used to criticise christianity by all reasonable people, including free thinkers, scientists, and ordinary people with common sense -but to no avail. His trial came to nothing -a great fiasco. So, the author realized that