𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Biophysical evaluation of the tumorigenic response to implanted polymers

✍ Scribed by Habal, Mutaz B. ;Powell, Rodger D.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1980
Tongue
English
Weight
454 KB
Volume
14
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9304

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

An evaluation of the biophysical changes of methylcholanthrene induced tumor (M~4~) in laboratory animals receiving four different alloplastic implants was conducted. The implants are silicone, polyether urethane, poly(methyl methacrylate), and bioglass. The tumor was allowed to grow to a large size in 28 days and then removed by shelling it from the surrounding tissue. Three different analytic volumetric measurements were carried; size in cm^3^, volume in milliliters and weight in grams. Statistical analysis on the three different analytic measurements did not disclose any significant differences in tumor growth potential between the control and the experimental groups. We conclude that in this study we were unable to demonstrate any tumor β€œfacilitation” effect by any of the implantable polymers used. Therefore, there is no contraindication in using the polymers to reconstruct defects produced by cancer ablative procedures.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Tissue response to implanted polymers: T
✍ Matlaga, Barbara F. ;Yasenchak, Lewis P. ;Salthouse, Thomas N. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1976 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 366 KB

## Abstract Studies were designed to demonstrate the need for standardization of shape of samples used as implants to evaluate histotoxicity of polymer materials. Six medical‐grade polymers (polypropylene, polyethylene, polyurethane, silicone rubber, poly(vinyl chloride), and Teflon) were extruded

An In Vivo Study of the Host Response to
✍ Alexandra P. Marques; Rui L. Reis; John A. Hunt πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 473 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract **Summary:** Implant failure is one of the major concerns in the biomaterials field. Several factors have been related to the fail but in general these biomaterials do not exhibit comparable physical, chemical or biological properties to natural tissues and ultimately, these devices can

Ex ova chick chorioallantoic membrane as
✍ Klueh, Ulrike ;Dorsky, David I. ;Moussy, Francis ;Kreutzer, Don L. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 218 KB

## Abstract One of the major obstacles in developing rationale strategies to control inflammation and fibrosis surrounding implants is the lack of a simple and inexpensive __in vivo__ model to screen tissue reactions to various biomaterials and implants. To begin to fill this gap, we have developed

Quantification of the inflammatory respo
✍ Fabre, T. ;Bertrand-Barat, J. ;Freyburger, G. ;Rivel, J. ;Dupuy, B. ;Durandeau, πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 125 KB

Flow cytometry was used to quantify an inflammatory reaction in vivo as a new approach to evaluating the biocompatibility of biomaterials. The exudate formed inside cylindrical tubes composed of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), silicone elastomer (SIL), or polyurethane (PU) implanted subcutaneously in the