Deparlmetlt ()[ P~3'ehiall 3' and Behacioral Seie~tces, Duke U/literally Aledica/ ('e~ler, Bv~ 3454, I) m'/mm N(' 27710 US I b3,4dnagenlent Science Departing:hi, School ql Business and Puhlic Al, ma~emcli: . \_ 0o%, us, t George Wctshington Lnipersilv. g)~x/liln{ton D(' ~ -~ ~Ccnler /~)r tile Stu@'
Bayesian Optimal Design for Phase II Screening Trials
✍ Scribed by Meichun Ding; Gary L. Rosner; Peter Müller
- Book ID
- 109223868
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 985 KB
- Volume
- 64
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0006-341X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The objective of a phase II cancer clinical trial is to screen a treatment that can produce a similar or better response rate compared to the current treatment results. This screening is usually carried out in two stages as proposed by Simon. For ineffective treatment, the trial should terminate at
In the conduct of a phase II cancer clinical trial, patients usually enter in two stages. If the response rate from the first stage is low, then the study terminates. Within various two-stage designs, Simon proposed the optimal and minimax criteria. In the co-operative group setting, practical consi
## Abstract We investigate Bayesian optimal designs for changepoint problems. We find robust optimal designs which allow for arbitrary distributions before and after the change, arbitrary prior densities on the parameters before and after the change, and any log‐concave prior density on the changep
Many popular sequential phase II clinical trial designs optimize some criterion subject to constraints on the error probabilities at null and alternative values of the response rate. Such designs may forfeit optimality if one fails to conduct analyses strictly according to plan. Moreover, a decision