𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Automatic noise quantification for confocal fluorescence microscopy images

✍ Scribed by Perrine Paul; Heiko Duessmann; Tytus Bernas; Heinrich Huber; Dimitrios Kalamatianos


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
721 KB
Volume
34
Category
Article
ISSN
0895-6111

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


a b s t r a c t Due to photo-toxicity, fluorescence microscopy imaging is a trade-off between signal to noise ratio, total observation time and spatio-temporal resolution. We propose a new and simple method to quantify the signal-dependent and the non-signal-dependent components of the noise from a single fluorescence microscopy image. No reference image is required and the computation time allows on line quantification of the noise. The estimation is realized in two steps. We first estimate the signal-dependent noise by fitting the intensity of an estimated noise free image, computed by median filtering, to the estimated global noise variance. The second step estimates the signal-independent noise as the background variance, by computing the variance of the most homogeneous sub blocks of the image. After having shown the validity of our approach, we then use this method to quantify the noise in one experiment and show its correlation with the qualitative expected image quality.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Fading correction for fluorescence quant
✍ Toril A. Nagelhus; Geir Slupphaug; Hans E. Krokan; Tore Lindmo πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 933 KB

Quantitative analysis in confocal microscopy meets with several problems such as fading of the fluorophore during scanning and attenuation of the fluorescence in thick tissue specimens. The present study reports a quantitative investigation of the enzyme uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG), which removes u