Dear sirs, Kvaslen, Neel and Tondeur in the recent paper, Chem. Engna Sci. d&1191-1204 (1985x have in a footnote on p. t 195 misstated a theorem that I derived several years ago and reoentfy published [Ckm. Engng Common. 41, 267-275 (1986)3. The theorem states that if the matrix A is positive semide
Author's reply to comments by G.T. Rochelle
โ Scribed by Wanda Pasiuk-Bronikowska; Krzsztof Jan Rudzinski
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 260 KB
- Volume
- 47
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-2509
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Letters to the Editors 3171 10 mM chloride, and is within 0.5% at 50 mM chloride. In comparison to water with low bulk bisulfite, the method of Pasiuk-Bronikowska and Rudzinski predicts that the flux will decrease by a factor of 2.0, zero charge flux predicts a factor of 1.5 and the rigorous solution predicts a factor of 1.2 of 1.5 depending on chloride concentration. It is clear that the method of Pasiuk-Bronikowska and Rudzinski not only gives absolute fluxes that are too low, but it also fails to account correctly for the effect of dissolved bisulfite on SO, flux.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Dear Sirs, Our first experiments in the Purdue LPCVD reactor indicated that the rate expression reported by Jensen and Graves (1983) was overestimating, sometimes substantially, growth rates observed in the Purdue system (Wilke et al., 1986; Takoudis et al., 1986). Furthermore, a close look at Figs