๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Augmentative and alternative communication for children with developmental disabilities

โœ Scribed by Romski, Mary Ann ;Sevcik, Rose A.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
61 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
1080-4013

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) encompasses all forms of communication from simple gestures, manual signs, and picture communication boards to American Sign Language and sophisticated computer-based devices that can speak in phrases and sentences for their users. This paper provides an overview of the research literature on AAC and children with developmental disabilities and highlights recent trends. It also provides some suggested directions for future research.

1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Assisting children and families who use
โœ Howard P. Parette Jr.; Diane Dempsey Marr ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 56 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

In developing individual education plans for children who need assistive technology devices, school psychologists will increasingly be called upon to assist in the decision making process regarding electronic augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. A thorough assessment is required

The assessment of developmentally disabl
โœ L. M. Raskin; A. S. Bloom; S. H. Klee; A. Reese ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1978 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 246 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Tests to Detect Organic Brain Dysfunction 111 literate population. The last is of great advantage in developing countries when a substantial proportion of the population is still illiterate. The true predictive capacity of the battery and the scoring procedure will be fully realized by further rese

A comparison of the Stanford-Binet abbre
โœ Allan S. Bloom; Steven H. Klee; Larry M. Raskin ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1977 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 339 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Three abbreviated versions of the Stanford-Binet were reviewed and compared for 50 chldren with developmental disabilities. The children ranged in age from 6 years -0 months to 15 years -11 months. While the IQs obtained from the abbreviated forms correlated highly with the com lete Binet I&, it was