Assessment of Data Quality: Errors of Measurement and Errors of Process
β Scribed by Stephan Arndt; Robert W. Woolson
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 588 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0323-3847
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
As projects progress from pilot studies with few simple variables and small samples, the research process as a whole becomes qualitatively more complex and subject to an array of contamination by errors and mistakes. Data usually undergo a series of manipulations (e.g., recording, computer entry, transmission) prior to final statistical analysis. The process, then, consists of numerous operations only ending with eventual statistical analysis and write-up. We present a means of estimating the impact of process error in the same terms as psychometric reliability and discuss the implications for reducing the impact of errors on overall data quality.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract When any process of measuring is considered, one of the basic questions is how to assess the precision of measurement methods and/or instruments. In this paper, this question is formulated and solved as a problem of tolerance regions for absolute and relative normaly distributed errors
We present a composite-data processing method which simultaneously processes two or more data sets with different measurement errors. We examine the role of the noise level of the data in the singular value decomposition inversion process, the criteria for a proper cutoff, and its effect on the unce
## Abstract DOSY data for mixtures are commonly processed either by single channel methods (e.g. HRβDOSY) or multichannel methods (e.g. CORE). Both aim to separate the signals from species of different molecular sizes by their diffusion coefficients; the result is displayed either as a 2D plot (as