We present results of comparative modeling on 11 targets from the CASP3 experiment. Our methods comprise the following steps: first, PSI-BLAST is used to find homologues of the target sequence in the nonredundant GenBank protein sequence database; second, after several iterations of PSI-BLAST, the r
Assessment of comparative modeling in CASP2
β Scribed by Martin, Andrew C. R.; MacArthur, Malcolm W.; Thornton, Janet M.
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 285 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0887-3585
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
An assessment is presented for all submissions to the comparative modeling challenge in the 1996 Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP2). Of the original 12 target structures, 9 were solved prior to the meeting: 8 by X-ray crystallography and 1 by NMR spectroscopy. These targets varied over a large range of difficulty, as assessed by the percentage sequence identity with the principal parent structure, which ranged from 20% up to 85%. The overall quality of the models reflected the similarity of the principal parent. As expected, when the sequence alignment was correct, the core was accurately modeled, with the largest deviations occurring in the loops.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Comparative modeling targets 1, 3, 9, and 17 were predicted by alignment of multiple sequences and structures, when available, followed by minimization using the program AMMP. The minimization used improved potentials, and distance restraints for regions of common structure. New prediction procedure
Performance in the three Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP) experiments has been compared in the areas of alignment accuracy for models based on homology and three-dimensional accuracy for models produced by using ab initio prediction methods. The homologous models span the c
During a blind protein structure prediction experiment (the third round of the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction; URL http://PredictionCenter.llnl.gov/ casp3/), four target proteins, T0047, T0048, T0055, and T0070, were modeled by comparison. These proteins display 6
PrISM (Protein Informatics System for Modeling) is a protein analysis and modeling system in which informatics, alignment, modeling, and assessment modules are integrated in a computational environment where protein analysis and modeling protocols can be designed and assessed interactively. It can t