𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comparative modeling of CASP3 targets using PSI-BLAST and SCWRL

✍ Scribed by Roland L. Dunbrack Jr.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
102 KB
Volume
37
Category
Article
ISSN
0887-3585

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


We present results of comparative modeling on 11 targets from the CASP3 experiment. Our methods comprise the following steps: first, PSI-BLAST is used to find homologues of the target sequence in the nonredundant GenBank protein sequence database; second, after several iterations of PSI-BLAST, the resulting profile or positionspecific similarity matrix is used to search a database of Protein Databank (PDB) sequences; third, from the list of hits resulting from the PDB search, a parent structure is chosen on the basis of the quality of the alignment and the quality of the experimental structure; fourth, this alignment is adjusted manually whenever insertions or deletions take place in secondary structure regions of the parent; fifth, the backbone is modeled from the parent structure and the alignment; and finally, the program SCWRL is used to replace nonconserved side chains onto the parent backbone given the target sequence. For comparison, we also produced structural models from the unaltered PSI-BLAST alignment, from an alignment from the nonprofile version of BLAST, and from the global sequence alignment program CLUSTAL W. Our results indicate that PSI-BLAST produced considerably better alignments than would be possible with either global or local pairwise sequence alignment algorithms and that manual adjustments were helpful. SCWRL, which uses a backbone-dependent rotamer library to predict side-chain conformations, did well in comparison with other methods used in CASP3. Proteins


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Analysis of comparative modeling predict
✍ Robert W. Harrison; Charles C. Reed; Irene T. Weber πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 228 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Comparative modeling targets 1, 3, 9, and 17 were predicted by alignment of multiple sequences and structures, when available, followed by minimization using the program AMMP. The minimization used improved potentials, and distance restraints for regions of common structure. New prediction procedure

Addressing the issue of sequence-to-stru
✍ Česlovas Venclovas; Krzysztof Ginalski; Krzysztof Fidelis πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 333 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

During a blind protein structure prediction experiment (the third round of the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction; URL http://PredictionCenter.llnl.gov/ casp3/), four target proteins, T0047, T0048, T0055, and T0070, were modeled by comparison. These proteins display 6