𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Assessing the accuracy of two-dimensional phase-contrast MRI measurements of complex unsteady flows

✍ Scribed by Yannis Papaharilaou; Denis J. Doorly; Spencer J. Sherwin


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
318 KB
Volume
14
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Two‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRI measurements of complex unsteady flows have been assessed for accuracy, together with procedures used to improve the precision of the measurements. Velocity measurements of single harmonic sinusoidal flow in a rigid bypass graft model with a fully three‐dimensional geometry were compared to an accurate numerical solution of the Navier‐Stokes equations for the same flow. Axial velocity profiles from the MRI were compared with the computational data, and instantaneous root mean square (rms) differences were calculated. Despite the complexity of the flow, with the aid of phase angle dynamic range extension, a spatially and temporally averaged rms error of between 7.8% and 11.5%, with respect to the spatially and temporally averaged velocity, was achieved. Spin saturation primarily and phase dispersion secondarily in complex transient recirculation zones were found to be significant contributors to overall error. Cross flow effects were also investigated but were of lesser significance. The result confirms the suitability of the technique for measuring complex unsteady flows. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;14:714–723. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Accuracy of MR phase contrast velocity m
✍ Richard Frayne; David A. Steinman; Brian K. Rutt; C. Ross Ethier 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 457 KB

## Abstract The accuracy of MR phase contrast (PC) velocity measurements for unsteady flow has been quantitatively assessed. Spatially resolved velocity fields were measured in a long straight tube using a gated PC technique. and the resulting MR PC velocity data were compared with velocities deriv

Factors affecting the accuracy of pressu
✍ Abbas Nasiraei-Moghaddam; Geoffrey Behrens; Nasser Fatouraee; Ramesh Agarwal; Er 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 321 KB

## Abstract In this work the effects of noise, resolution, and velocity (flow) on the measurement of intravascular pressure from phase‐contrast (PC) MRI are discussed. To elucidate these effects, we employed an axisymmetric geometry that enabled us to calculate pressures in <2 min on a Sun Ultra SP

Accuracy of phase-contrast flow measurem
✍ Chao Tang; Duane D. Blatter; Dennis L. Parker 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 888 KB

## Abstract The accuracy of volume flow rate measurements obtained with phase‐contrast methods was assessed by means of computer simulation and in vitro experiments. Factors studied include (a) the partial‐volume effect due to voxel dimensions relative to vessel dimensions and orientation and (b) i

Method to correct for the effects of lim
✍ K.M Lagerstrand; H. Lehmann; G. Starck; B. Vikhoff-Baaz; S. Ekholm; E. Forssell- 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 210 KB

## Abstract Phase‐contrast (PC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) flow measurements suffer from the effect of the point spread function (PSF) due to the limited sampling of __k__‐space. The PSF, which in this case is a __sinc__ function, deforms the flow profile and forms a ringing pattern around th