๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

โœ Scribed by Frans H. van Eemeren


Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Year
0
Tongue
English
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectic
โœ Frans H. van Eemeren ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2018 ๐Ÿ› Springer International Publishing ๐ŸŒ English

<p><p></p><p>The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative a

Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectic
โœ Frans H. van Eemeren ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2018 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English

The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative activity and d

Dissociation in Argumentative Discussion
โœ Agnes van Rees ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐ŸŒ English

Dissociation is a pervasive argumentative technique that can be found in argumentative discussions from all realms of public and private life. Up till now, a comprehensive and systematic argumentation theoretical study of dissociation does not exist. This book aims to fill this gap. The treatment i

Dissociation In Argumentative Discussion
โœ M. Agnes van Rees (auth.) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English

<p><P>Dissociation is a pervasive argumentative technique that can be found in argumentative discussions from all realms of public and private life. Up till now, a comprehensive and systematic argumentation theoretical study of dissociation does not exist. This book aims to fill this gap. </P><P></P

Argumentation, Communication, and Fallac
โœ Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2016 ๐Ÿ› Routledge ๐ŸŒ English

This volume gives a theoretical account of the problem of analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse. After placing argumentation in a communicative perspective, and then discussing the fallacies that occur when certain rules of communication are violated, the authors offer an alternative to b

A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: Th
โœ Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› Cambridge University Press ๐ŸŒ English

Two authorities in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a ''critical discussion'' serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating and producing argumentative