Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectic
โ Frans H. van Eemeren
๐ Library
๐
0
๐ Springer International Publishing
๐ English
โฆ LIBER โฆ
๐
Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective
โ Scribed by Frans H. van Eemeren
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Year
- 2018
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 206
- Series
- Argumentation Library 33
- Edition
- 1st ed.
- Category
- Library
โฌ Acquire This Volume
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative activity and dialectically as part of a regulated critical exchange aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. As a result, the book also systematically explains how the constitutive parts of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, which are discussed in a number of separate publications, hang together.
The following crucial topics are discussed: (1) argumentation theory as a discipline; (2) the meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics; (3) the model of a critical discussion aimed at resolving a difference of opinion; (4) fallacies as violations of a code of conduct for reasonable argumentative discourse; (5) descriptive research of argumentative reality; (6) analysis as theoretically-motivated reconstruction; (7) strategic manoeuvring aimed at combining achieving effectiveness with maintaining reasonableness; (8) the conventionalization of argumentative practices; (9) prototypical argumentative patterns; (10) pragma-dialectics amidst other approaches.
Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective is clearly written and makes argumentation theory understandable to all scholars and advanced students interested in argumentation research.
โฆ Table of Contents
Front Matter ....Pages i-xi
Argumentation Theory as a Discipline (Frans H. van Eemeren)....Pages 1-17
Building a Theory of Argumentation (Frans H. van Eemeren)....Pages 19-32
A Model of a Critical Discussion (Frans H. van Eemeren)....Pages 33-50
Critical Discussion and the Identification of Fallacies (Frans H. van Eemeren)....Pages 51-70
Descriptive Studies of Argumentative Discourse (Frans H. van Eemeren)....Pages 71-87
Analysis as Resolution-Oriented Reconstruction (Frans H. van Eemeren)....Pages 89-109
Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse (Frans H. van Eemeren)....Pages 111-127
Distinguishing Between Different Kinds of Argumentative Practices (Frans H. van Eemeren)....Pages 129-148
Prototypical Argumentative Patterns (Frans H. van Eemeren)....Pages 149-168
Pragma-Dialectics Amidst Other Approaches to Argumentation (Frans H. van Eemeren)....Pages 169-192
Back Matter ....Pages 193-199
โฆ Subjects
Philosophy; Business Ethics; Political Philosophy; Social Philosophy; Moral Philosophy
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectic
โ Frans H. van Eemeren
๐ Library
๐
2018
๐ Springer
๐ English
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative activity and d
Dissociation in Argumentative Discussion
โ Agnes van Rees
๐ Library
๐
2008
๐ English
Dissociation is a pervasive argumentative technique that can be found in argumentative discussions from all realms of public and private life. Up till now, a comprehensive and systematic argumentation theoretical study of dissociation does not exist. This book aims to fill this gap. The treatment i
Dissociation In Argumentative Discussion
โ M. Agnes van Rees (auth.)
๐ Library
๐
2009
๐ Springer Netherlands
๐ English
<p><P>Dissociation is a pervasive argumentative technique that can be found in argumentative discussions from all realms of public and private life. Up till now, a comprehensive and systematic argumentation theoretical study of dissociation does not exist. This book aims to fill this gap. </P><P></P
Argumentation, Communication, and Fallac
โ Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst
๐ Library
๐
2016
๐ Routledge
๐ English
This volume gives a theoretical account of the problem of analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse. After placing argumentation in a communicative perspective, and then discussing the fallacies that occur when certain rules of communication are violated, the authors offer an alternative to b
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: Th
โ Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst
๐ Library
๐
2003
๐ Cambridge University Press
๐ English
Two authorities in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a ''critical discussion'' serves as a theoretical tool for analyzing, evaluating and producing argumentative