In Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse, Frans H. van Eemeren brings together the dialectical and the rhetorical dimensions of argumentation by introducing the concept of strategic maneuvering. Strategic maneuvering refers to the arguerβs continual efforts to reconcile aiming for effecti
Argumentation In Actual Practice: Topical Studies About Argumentative Discourse In Context
β Scribed by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen
- Publisher
- John Benjamins B.V.
- Year
- 2019
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 352
- Series
- Argumentation In Context Vol. 17
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Argumentation in Actual Practice' contains a collection of topical studies about argumentative discourse in context written by argumentation scholars from a diversity of academic backgrounds. Some contributions provide general perspectives, other contributions deal with specific issues, particular types of argumentative discourse or individual argumentative speech events. The contexts in which argumentation is examined vary from politics and the media to medical, juridical, educational, commercial or military contexts, a specific academic discipline, a special issue or pertain to all kinds of contextualised argumentative discourse. The issues discussed include the interpretation and analysis of argumentation, strategic manoeuvring, argument schemes, the stock issues, the fallacies, the principle of charity and the persuasiveness of argumentative discourse. A common feature is that they are all empirically-oriented and that virtually all of them are strongly concerned with an adequate understanding of contextualised argumentative discourse and the factors that may increase or decrease its reasonableness and effectiveness.
β¦ Subjects
Argumentation, Argumentative Discourse
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This volume identifies and analyses English words and expressions that are crucial for an adequate reconstruction of argumentative discourse. It provides a systematic set of instruments for giving a well founded analysis that results in an analytic overview of the elements that are relevant for the
<p><P>Argumentative Indicators: A Pragma-Dialectical Study identifies and analyses English words and expressions that are crucial for an adequate reconstruction of argumentative discourse. It provides the analyst of argumentative discussions and texts with a systematic set of instruments for giving
It is a longstanding if not altogether coherent tradition of logic and rhetorical studies that an argument can be incorrect or fallacious in virtue of some proposition in it being βirrelevantβ. This monograph clarifies that tradition. Non-classical propositional calculi, including relevance logics a
<p><p><i>Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory</i><b></b>brings together twenty exploratory studies on important subjects of research in contemporary argumentation theory. The essays are based on papers that were presented at the 7<sup>th</sup> Conference of the International Society for the Study
Since the late 1950s the study of argumentation has developed from a marginal part of logic and rhetoric into a genuine interdisciplinary academic discipline. After having first been primarily concerned with creating an adequate philosophical perspective on argumentation, argumentation theorists hav