Abstract
| I. | Introduction | 76 |
| II. | Screening Applications | 77 |
| | A. Ligand‐Screening Assays | 77 |
| | B. Characterization of Ligand–Protein Binding | 81 |
| | C. Metabolic Screening | 81 |
| | D. Screening for Electrophilic Metabolites | 83 |
| III. | Conclusions | 84 |
| Acknowledgments | 85 |
| References | 85 |
Pulsed ultrafiltration‐mass spectrometry (PUF‐MS) is a method with a variety of uses for the discovery and development of biologically active small molecules, including the screening of combinatorial libraries and natural product extracts for biologically active compounds, investigation of thermodynamic and kinetic ligand–receptor binding parameters, high‐throughput metabolic screening, and the screening of combinatorial libraries and botanical extracts for electrophilic metabolites. Solution‐phase ligand‐screening assays that use pulsed ultrafiltration‐mass spectrometry are useful for “reverse pharmacology” studies in which a macromolecular receptor of interest has been isolated, but ligands for the receptor are needed. Protein‐binding studies that involve pulsed ultrafiltration can be used to rapidly determine classical binding parameters for interactions between a macromolecular receptor and a compound of interest. Metabolic screening assays can identify substrates for cytochromes P450, and should be capable of characterizing phase I metabolites with a throughput of at least 60 compounds/hr. Pulsed ultrafiltration can also be used in conjunction with LC‐MS‐MS to screen mixtures for compounds that might be activated metabolically to electrophilic quinoid and epoxide metabolites by cytochrome P450; that screening can provide early warning of compounds likely to be toxic when administered in large doses. The combination of pulsed‐ultrafiltration extraction and mass spectrometric detection provides the sensitivity and selectivity necessary to characterize compounds present at low concentrations in complex chemical mixtures, and is applicable to the analysis of biologically active compounds from combinatorial libraries and botanical extracts. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Mass Spec Rev 21:76–86, 2002; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mas.10020