I n certain a r m of medical reeearch, the two-period CrOBBOVer deaign is a frequent choice for comparing treatmentsA and B in a randomized clinicel trial. Earlier work by Grizzle and by Brown WBB baaed upon a parametric theory linear model. Recenfly, the present authom employed D. R. Cox's additive
Analysis of two-treatment, two-period crossover trials in emergency medicine
โ Scribed by James F. Reed III
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 77 KB
- Volume
- 43
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1097-6760
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Analysis of Two-Treatment, Two-Period Crossover Trials in Emergency Medicine See related article, p. 6, and editorial, p. 15.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
In the analysis of a two-period cro88over study GBIZZLE (1965) suggeata that, if a preliminary k t for a period by treatment inbraction (residual effeot, carryover effect) fsignificant at the 10 o/o level, the direct effects of the treatments should be compared by performix$ a t -h t on the data fro
## In this paper, hierarchical Bayesian methods for the analysis of crossover designs are developed. First, we consider two hierarchical prior structures yielding posterior quantities that can be obtained via numerical integration. We illustrate this method with an analysis of two well-known data
## Background: Torsemide has predictable absorption compared to furosemide. thereby, torsemide results in more constant exposure to active drug. our hypothesis was that this pharmacokinetic difference between these commonly used loop diuretics may translate into disparate antihypertensive responses