Analysis of broadside-coupled asymmetric coplanar waveguide with one lateral ground plane
✍ Scribed by Adnan Görür; Ceyhun Karpuz
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 222 KB
- Volume
- 24
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0895-2477
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Monte Carlo simulation of the backscattering enhancement of electromagnetic wa¨es from a ¨egetation canopy due to the ¨olume᎐surface interaction is presented in this paper. A method of coherently adding up the scattered fields from scatterers is de¨eloped to illustrate the coherent scattering effect of backscattering enhancement. Results are compared with those of independent scattering, and they re¨eal that the angular width of the backscattering enhancement from the ¨olume᎐surface interaction is appreciable for both HH and VV polarized wa¨es. The ¨ariation of the angular width with the canopy height and the incident wa¨e frequency is also presented.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract A conformal mapping method and partial capacitance techniques are used to derive simple and accurate closed‐form expressions of odd‐ and even‐mode capacitances and characteristic impedances for a C‐shaped microshield broadside‐coupled coplanar waveguide (CMBCCPW) with buried ground stri
## Abstract In this study, fast and new analytical formulations have been presented for correct loss calculations in asymmetrical coplanar waveguides (CPW) with finite‐extent ground planes for CPW mode. To generalize loss analysis for CPW mode, not only gaps but also finite ground planes are assume
or 4 1 0 1 1 0, we get the wrong answer unless we make ␣ s i␣ Ј.
## Abstract This article presents the quasi‐static analyses of elliptical‐coupled parallel coplanar waveguide (ECP CPW), cylindrical‐coupled parallel coplanar waveguide (CCP CPW), and coupled parallel coplanar waveguide (CP CPW) with finite ground planes. Conformal‐mapping techniques have been used
But the efficiency of the multiapplicator is better because of Ž 2 a smaller radiating aperture 35 cm for structure D versus 2