An examination of cointegration relations between futures and local grain markets
โ Scribed by T. Randall Fortenbery; Hector O. Zapata
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 799 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
nderstanding and identifying the components of market price risk is becoming U an increasingly important part of managing an agricultural enterprise. The Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (commonly called the 1990 Farm Bill) has reduced the number of farm acres eligible for deficiency payment benefits through the triple base provisions. With additional concern over government expenditures for farm programs and movements toward trade liberalization policies, it is conceivable that the government's contribution toward individual firms' management of commodity price risk will continue to diminish in future years.
An important component in understanding and managing market price risk for agricultural commodities is identifying the relationships between local cash markets and nationally traded commodity futures markets. It has long been argued that futures markets represent an assimilation of all relevant public information regarding the supply/demand relationship for a given commodity in some future time period [Telser (1958); Cox (1986); Garcia, Leuthold, Fortenbery, and Sarassoro (1988)l. Understanding the extent to which local prices are cointegrated with national futures prices is critical in "localizing" futures price information. Without a thorough knowledge of the relationships between local and futures markets, it is difficult to decipher how changes in futures prices can be expected to impact local market agents.
Considerable effort has been devoted to measuring the dynamics of price discovery when both cash and futures markets exist. Recent studies in agricultural markets include Ollerman and Farris (1985); Brorsen, Ollerman, and Farris (1989);Koontz, Garcia, and Hudson (1990);and Bessler and Covey (1991). A common feature of these studies is that they focused on nonstorable commodities. Research on storable commodities is necessary to further understand the causal relationships between futures and cash markets, and lead to a more complete understanding of basis relationships and price forecasting opportunities in these markets. Such work can provide insight into the relative efficiency of markets for storable commodities, as well as provide important information for agents concerned with the process of price discovery and risk. One might expect, for instance, that because of the storage function, cash and futures markets for storables are more highly cointegrated than for nonstorables [Bessler and Covey (1991)l. A test of this
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Commodity futures and equity markets differ in several important respects. Nevertheless, it was found that momentum profits in commodities are highly significant for holding periods as long as 9 months, and returns to momentum strategies are roughly equal in magnitude to those that have
## Abstract Price risk is an important factor for both copper purchasers, who use the commodity as a major input in their production process, and copper refiners, who must deal with cashโflow volatility. Information from NYMEX cash and futures prices is used to examine optimal hedging behavior for
article examines the relationship between returns and trading volume for three petroleum futures contracts. Using daily data on futures prices and trading volume, the study first tests for linear causality between returns and volume. The results of this linear causality test show that futures return
## Abstract This study investigates the relation between petroleum futures spread variability, trading volume, and open interest in an attempt to uncover the source(s) of variability in futures spreads. The study finds that contemporaneous (lagged) volume and open interest provide significant expla