## BACKGROUND. The ability to make a precise preoperative diagnosis is a valuable and effective method in improving the prognosis of patients with gastric carcinoma. The authors examined retrospectively whether preoperative histopathologic analysis with p53 protein, Ki-67 labeling index, and DNA p
An evaluation of the markers p53 and Ki-67 for their predictive value in prostate cancer
β Scribed by Uzoaru, Ike; Rubenstein, Marvin; Mirochnik, Yelena; Slobodskoy, Leonid; Shaw, Michael; Guinan, Patrick
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 32 KB
- Volume
- 67
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-4790
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Background and Objectives: p53 and Ki-67 are but two markers being evaluated for their predictive value in prostate cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare p53 and Ki-67 with age, stage, Gleason score, and ploidy for their prognostic abilities in prostate cancer. Methods: Prostate cancer specimens from 134 patients were immunohistochemically stained for p53 and Ki-67 expression and differences evaluated by SPSS analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods. The dependent variable was patient survival and the independent variables were age, stage, Gleason score, and ploidy. Results: In decreasing order of prediction of survival were stage (P < 0.001), Gleason score (P < 0.001), age (P β«Χ‘β¬ 0.1869), Ki-67 (P β«Χ‘β¬ 0.2284), p53 (P β«Χ‘β¬ 0.4282) and ploidy (P β«Χ‘β¬ 0.8141).
Conclusion:
It is concluded that stage and Gleason score are significant predictors of survival while p53, Ki-67, age and ploidy are not.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
noma recurrence after 5 years of follow-up (N Γ 30) and those with carcinoma 1 The Matsunaga-Conte Prostate Cancer Rerecurrence (N Γ 17). Gleason grade, clustered p53 immunostaining, Ki-67 immunosearch Center and the Scott Department of Urolstaining, and AI were determined by standard techniques. og