An evaluation of lattice Boltzmann schemes for porous medium flow simulation
โ Scribed by Chongxun Pan; Li-Shi Luo; Cass T. Miller
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 348 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0045-7930
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
We quantitatively evaluate the capability and accuracy of the lattice Boltzmann equation (LBE) for modeling flow through porous media. In particular, we conduct a comparative study of the LBE models with the multiple-relaxation-time (MRT) and the Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK) single-relaxation-time (SRT) collision operators. We also investigate several fluid-solid boundary conditions including: (1) the standard bounce-back (SBB) scheme, (2) the linearly interpolated bounce-back (LIBB) scheme, (3) the quadratically interpolated bounce-back (QIBB) scheme, and (4) the multi-reflection (MR) scheme. Three-dimensional flow through two porous media-a body-centered cubic (BCC) array of spheres and a random-sized sphere-pack-are examined in this study. For flow past a BCC array of spheres, we validate the linear LBE model by comparing its results with the nonlinear LBE model. We investigate systematically the viscosity-dependence of the computed permeability, the discretization error, and effects due to the choice of relaxation parameters with the MRT and BGK schemes. Our results show unequivocally that the MRT-LBE model is superior to the BGK-LBE model, and interpolation significantly improves the accuracy of the fluid-solid boundary conditions.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The lattice Boltzmann method (LBM) with the fifteen-velocity model is applied to simulations of isothermal flows in a three-dimensional porous structure. A periodic boundary condition with a pressure difference at the inlet and outlet is presented. Flow characteristics at a pore scale and pressure d
The bounce-back boundary condition for lattice Boltzmann simulations is evaluated for ยฏow about an inยฎnite periodic array of cylinders. The solution is compared with results from a more accurate boundary condition formulation for the lattice Boltemann method and with ยฎnite difference solutions. The