𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

An analytical model for freeboard and in-bed limestone sulfation in fluidized-bed coal combustors

✍ Scribed by D.C. Fee; K.M. Myles; G. Marroquin; Liang-Shih fan


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
525 KB
Volume
39
Category
Article
ISSN
0009-2509

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


A new model, which combines in-bed and freeboard sulfation, significantly improves the ability to predict sulfur capture by limestone sorbents in fluidized-bed coal combustors. In this model, the in-bed hydrodynamics are described in terms of a bubble phase and an emulsion phase while the freeboard region has only a diluted emulsion phase. The solids, which are in the emulsion phases, are considered to be completely back-mixed; the gaseous bubble phase travels in plug-flow but exchanges with the emulsion phase. The sulfation reaction occurs principally in the emulsion phase and the reaction rate is a direct function of the sulfur dioxide concentration, the extent of the calcium oxide conversion (as measured by a thermogravimetric analyzer), and the amount of limestone present in the bed and in the freeboard. The amount present, or holdup, in the free-board is calculated from empirical correlations for elutriation and from particle-time trajectories as predicted from equations of motion.

The model indicates that a significant amount of sulfur capture can occur in the freeboard region, especially with high superficial gas velocities and small particle sizes, both of which lead to increased freeboard holdup. For an overall sulfur retention of 90x, approximately 9% of the sulfur is predicted to be captured within the freeboard above a combustor bed 1.8 m by 1.8 m by 1.2 m high of 1200 pm diameter limestone particles that are fluidrzed at 2.4 m/s. The model also predicts that the sulfur captured by the entrained particles is negligible. These predictions compare favorably with the actual sulfur retentions experienced in similar sized pilot-scale combustors.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A single, particle-size model for sulfur
✍ D. C. Lee; Christos Georgakis πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1981 πŸ› American Institute of Chemical Engineers 🌐 English βš– 946 KB

## Abstract A reactor model is presented to calculate the sulfur retention and SO~2~ emission of a fluidized‐bed coal combustor with absorption of SO~2~ by limestone or dolomite. It is based on the two‐phase theory of fluidization and a two parameter simplified rate expression for the sulfation rea

An investigation of fluidized-bed scalin
✍ A.E. Almstedt; V. Zakkay πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1990 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 792 KB

In order to investigate the validity of the scaling relationships for fluidized beds suggested by Fitzgerald and Crane, and Glicksman, comparative measurements of the bubble activity have been carried out in a pressurized fluid&d bed burning coal, and in a smaller pressurized model bed operated at s

Sulphur capture and its interactions wit
✍ Weigang Lin; Karel Svoboda; Cor M. van den Bleek πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1992 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 542 KB

An approximate analytical solution, based on basic equations of gas-solid reactions, is proposed to deecribe the sulphur capture by calcium based sorbenta and their catalytic effects on NO, formation in FBC. The model is tested by experimental data obtained in both TGA and FBC units from literature.