✦ LIBER ✦

Aggression following performance feedback: The influences of narcissism, feedback valence, and comparative standard

✍ Scribed by Christopher T. Barry; William F. Chaplin; Sarah J. Grafeman

Book ID: 113836768
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2006
Tongue: English
Weight: 120 KB
Volume: 41
Category: Article
ISSN: 0191-8869
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.008

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Enhancing students’ self-regulation and

Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: the influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards

✍ Andju Sara Labuhn; Barry J. Zimmerman; Marcus Hasselhorn 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 275 KB

The influence of competences and support

The influence of competences and support on school performance feedback use

✍ Vanhoof, Jan; Verhaeghe, Goedele; Verhaeghe, Jean Pierre; Valcke, Martin; Van Pe 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 255 KB

The effects of token reinforcement, feed

The effects of token reinforcement, feedback and response cost on standardized test performance

✍ Michael M. Holt; Tom R. Hobbs 📂 Article 📅 1979 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 337 KB

The influence of performance feedback on

The influence of performance feedback on goal-setting and mental effort regulation

✍ Louise Venables; Stephen H. Fairclough 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 360 KB

Standardized Goals and Performance Feedb

Standardized Goals and Performance Feedback Aggregated Beyond the Work Unit: Optimizing the Use of Engineered Labor Standards and Electronic Performance Monitoring

✍ David T. Goomas; Timothy D. Ludwig 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 152 KB

The effects of performance attributions

The effects of performance attributions and outcome dependence on leader feedback behavior following poor subordinate performance

✍ Sherry E. Moss; Mark J. Martinko 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 175 KB 👁 2 views

While feedback is considered to be among the most eective motivational tools available in organizations, there is substantial evidence that leaders are often poor sources of feedback. Following poor subordinate performance, leaders have been shown to avoid providing feedback, delay providing feedbac