𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Adjuvant systemic therapy for male breast carcinoma

✍ Scribed by Sharon H. Giordano; George H. Perkins; Kristine Broglio; Sherry G. Garcia; Lavinia P. Middleton; Aman U. Buzdar; Gabriel N. Hortobagyi


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
136 KB
Volume
104
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the current study, the authors describe the M. D. Anderson experience with adjuvant systemic therapy in male breast carcinoma patients.

METHODS

A total of 156 men with a diagnosis of breast carcinoma registered and were treated at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1944 and 2001. One hundred thirty‐five men had nonmetastatic breast carcinoma at diagnosis and were included in this analysis. Patients' charts were retrospectively reviewed to obtain details of patient characteristics, adjuvant therapy, and outcomes. Analysis was performed with descriptive statistics; the log rank test was used to compare outcomes.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 59 years (range, 25–80 yrs). Median follow‐up was 13.8 years (range, 0.6–32.5 yrs). Sixty percent of patients had tumors 2 cm or smaller. Pathologic lymph node involvement was seen in 55% of patients. Tumors were estrogen receptor‐positive in 85% of cases and progesterone receptor‐positive in 71%. Chemotherapy was administered to 32 men (84% with adjuvant chemotherapy, 6% with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 9% with both). Approximately 81% received anthracycline‐based regimens; 9% received additional taxanes; and 16% were treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5‐fluorouracil (CMF). The median number of cycles was 6 (range, 4–14 cycles). Thirty‐eight men received adjuvant hormonal therapy (92% received tamoxifen and 8% were treated with other therapy). The 5‐year and 10‐year overall survival rates were 86% and 75%, respectively, for men with lymph node‐negative disease and 70% and 43%, respectively, for men with lymph node‐positive disease. For men with lymph node‐positive disease, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of death (hazards ratio [HR] of 0.78), although this difference was not statistically significant. Overall survival was significantly better for men who received adjuvant hormonal therapy (HR of 0.45; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This relatively large series of men with breast carcinoma suggests that men benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy for breast carcinoma, with the greatest benefit from adjuvant hormonal therapy. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Systemic adjuvant therapy of breast canc
✍ Garrett, Thomas J.; Vahdat, Linda T.; Kinne, David W. 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 52 KB 👁 2 views

Systematic adjuvant therapy has improved the outcome for women with operable breast cancer. As a result, a substantial proportion of patients with this disease are candidates for adjuvant treatment. In providing a woman with recommendations for therapy, her risk of developing recurrent breast cancer

Systemic and adjuvant therapy for patien
✍ Jeffrey W. Clark; Arvin S. Glicksman; Harold J. Wanebo 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 582 KB

## BACKGROUND. Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease with 55% of patients surviving 5 years. There is no curative therapy for patients who cannot be surgically resected. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy can provide palliation but have not had a significant impact on 5-year survival. ## ME

Systemic and adjuvant therapy for patien
✍ Jeffrey W. Clark; Arvin S. Glicksman; Harold J. Wanebo 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 582 KB

## BACKGROUND. Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease with 55% of patients surviving 5 years. There is no curative therapy for patients who cannot be surgically resected. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy can provide palliation but have not had a significant impact on 5-year survival. ## M

Refined measurement of outcome for adjuv
✍ John W. Gamel; Gianni Bonadonna; Pinuccia Valagussa; Michael J. Edwards 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 102 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND Traditional nonparametric statistical methods do not provide a quantitative measure of the lifetime benefit from adjuvant therapy. This deficiency makes it difficult to determine the long‐term difference in impact between the two treatment arms of a clinical trial. ## ME