## Abstract In this paper, it will be shown that the isomorphism classes of regular orientable embeddings of the complete bipartite graph __K__~__n,n__~ are in oneβtoβone correspondence with the permutations on __n__ elements satisfying a given criterion, and the isomorphism classes of them are com
Acyclic orientations of complete bipartite graphs
β Scribed by Douglas B. West
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1995
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 216 KB
- Volume
- 138
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-365X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
For a complete bipartite graph, the number of dependent edges in an acyclic orientation can be any integer from n-1 to e, where n and e are the number of vertices and edges in the graph.
Ke3,words: Bipartite graph; Acyclic orientation
Ill combinatorics we often ask whether an integer parameter can take on all values between its extremes. In this note we consider a question of this type for acyclic orientations of a graph. An acyclic orientation assigns an orientation to each edge of a simple graph so that no cycle is formed.
In an acyclic orientation H of a graph G, an edge is dependent if reversing its orientation creates a cycle -the other edges force its orientation. This definition is due to Paul Edelman [ll, who observed that the number f(H) of independent edges always satisfies n(G)--I <~f(H)<~e(G) (where n(G) and e(G) denote the number of vertices and edges of G), and that these extremes are achievable when G is bipartite. Lemma 1 below includes the lower bound, and orienting all edges from one partite set to the other achieves the upper bound. Edelman asked whether G being bipartite guarantees that every number from n(G)-1 to e(G) is achievable as f(H) for some acyclic orientation H of G . We call such a graph fully orientable. The Petersen graph, despite not being bipartite, is fully orientable, and we do not know of a triangle-free graph that is not fully orientable.
More generally, one can ask which values off(H) are achievable for an arbitrary G It is not possible to make all three edges of a triangle independent; hence e(G) may not be achievable. Indeed, the strongly connected components of an acyclic orientation of K, must be single vertices; hence every acyclic orientation of K, is a transitive orientation and has precisely n-1 independent edges.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Let G be a finite graph with p vertices and x its chromatic polynomial. A combinatorial interpretation is given to the positive integer (-l)px(-A), where h is a positive integer, in terms of acyclic orientations of G. In particular, (-l)Px(-1) is the number of acyclic orientations of G. An appl
An acyclic orientation of an undirected graph is an orientation of its edges such that the resulting directed graph contains no cycles. The random graph G is a n, p probability space consisting of subgraphs of K that are obtained by selecting each n K -edge with independent probability p. The random
Greene and Zaslavsky proved that the number of acyclic orientations of a graph G with a unique sink at a given vertex is, up to sign, the linear coefficient of the chromatic polynomial. We give three proofs of this result using pure induction, noncommutative symmetric functions, and an algorithmic b
We want to find an unknown acyclic orientation ~\* of an (undirected) graph G by testing for certain edges how they are oriented according to ~\*. How many tests do we need in the worst case? We give upper and lower bounds for this number c(G) in terms of the independence number of G and study the c
A formula is developed for the number of congruence classes of 2cell imbeddings of complete bipartite graphs in closed orientable surfaces.