Accuracy of blind versus ultrasound-guided suprapatellar bursal injection
✍ Scribed by Yong Bum Park; Won Ah Choi; Yong-Kyun Kim; Sang Chul Lee; Ji Hae Lee
- Book ID
- 102887972
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 517 KB
- Volume
- 40
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0091-2751
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose.
To compare the accuracy rates between ultrasound (US)‐guided and blind knee intra‐articular injection via the suprapatellar bursa.
Methods.
Ninety‐nine patients with radiographically confirmed knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren/Lawrence grade 2 or 3) without effusion were included. Fifty patients were assigned to the US‐guided injection group and 49 to the blind injection group. After a US‐guided or blind injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) and contrast dye through the suprapatellar bursa into the knee joint, a radiographic image was obtained in each case to ascertain whether all injected material had reached the intra‐articular space.
Results.
US‐guided HA injection exhibited a significantly greater accuracy (48 of 50 knees, 96.0%) than blind injection (41 of 49 knees, 83.7%).
Conclusions.
Intra‐articular injections through the suprapatellar bursa under US guidance increased the accuracy of knee joint injections. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound,2011
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Objective Most corticosteroid injections into the joint are guided by the clinical examination (CE), but up to 70% are inaccurately placed, which may contribute to an inadequate response. The aim of this study was to investigate whether ultrasound (US) guidance improves the accuracy
## Abstract ## Background and Objectives Performing a central venous catheterization (CVC) on older patients for long‐term central intravenous therapy could be a very important procedure. It could be associated with a high incidence of related complications, especially on over 65‐year‐old, high ri