๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Accuracy and reproducibility of instrumented knee-drawer tests

โœ Scribed by Dr. Ph. Edixhoven; Dr. R. Huiskes; R. De Graaf; Th. J. G. Van Rens; T. J. Slooff


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
920 KB
Volume
5
Category
Article
ISSN
0736-0266

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Instrumented devices for knee-drawer tests have become popular in orthopaedics relatively recently. The objective of the present study was to document the effects of several parameters on the accuracy and reproducibility of anterior-posterior (AP) drawer measurements. An instrumented knee-drawer tester for AP laxity evaluations was constructed, based on the differential displacement method, measuring shifts of the tuberosity relative to the patella. The accuracy of the AP-shift was determined with the parallel use of a highly accurate roentgen stereo photogrammetric (RSP) measurement system on two postmortem leg specimens. The effects of relative motion between patella and femur were negligible. In addition to AP shifts, significant knee flexion and tibial rotations occurred, although the foot and the thigh were fixed as well as possible. The differential displacement method was effective in circumventing this problem. The accuracy of the AP shift was greater than 10%. The reproducibility of the AP drawer parameters (shifts and compliances) was determined in normal subjects and patients. Tests were made to evaluate the effects of different observers, time sequences, and different days. In addition, effects of muscle relaxation were studied. Overall, the shift parameters at different forces were found to be reproducible to between 5 and 15%. The slopes (compliances) of the laxity curves, at different forces, were found to be reproducible between 20 and 40%. The reproducibility was principally affected by deviations in the subject positioning procedure.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Measurement reproducibility of two comme
โœ Peter A. Torzilli; Robert A. Panariello; Andrew Forbes; Thomas J. Santner; Russe ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 735 KB

## Abstract Objective evaluation of patients' knee motion using mechanical devices, whether for diagnostic purposes or for assessing rehabilitative procedures, requires that these devices be reproducible, in order to avoid errors independent of the patients' condition. This study prospectively eval

The reproducibility of patch tests
โœ BOURKE; BATTA; PRAIS; ABDULLAH; FOULDS ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 253 KB

There is conflicting evidence regarding the reproducibility of patch testing. Discordant results have been reported in up to 44% of cases. The clinical relevance of these discordant patch tests has not been previously assessed. We studied 383 consecutive patients receiving simultaneous duplicate pat