## Abstract ## Purpose: To evaluate a single‐pass fast spoiled gradient echo (FSPGR) two‐point Dixon sequence and a gradient echo sequence with spectral fat suppression in their performance at 3 T for fat suppressed contrast‐enhanced bilateral breast imaging. ## Materials and Methods: Twenty pat
Accelerated bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D spiral breast MRI using TSENSE
✍ Scribed by Misung Han; Bruce L. Daniel; Brian A. Hargreaves
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 855 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To assess the ability of adaptive sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal filtering (TSENSE) to accelerate bilateral dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) 3D breast MRI.
Materials and Methods
Bilateral DCE breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams were performed using a dual‐band water‐only excitation and a “stack‐of‐spirals” imaging trajectory. TSENSE was applied in the slab direction with an acceleration factor of 2. Four different techniques for sensitivity map calculation were compared by analyzing resultant contrast uptake curves qualitatively and quantitatively for 10 patient datasets. In addition, image quality and temporal resolution were compared between unaccelerated and TSENSE images.
Results
TSENSE can increase temporal resolution by a factor of 2 in DCE imaging, providing better depiction of contrast uptake curves and good image quality. Of the different methods tested, calculation of static sensitivity maps by averaging late postcontrast frames yields the lowest aliasing artifact level based on ROI analysis.
Conclusion
TSENSE acceleration combined with 3D spiral imaging is very time‐efficient, providing 11‐second temporal resolution and 1.1 × 1.1 × 3 mm^3^ spatial resolution over a 20 × 20 × 10 cm^3^ field of view for each breast. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1425–1434. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The purpose of this study was to apply an empirical mathematical model (EMM) to kinetic data acquired under a clinical protocol to determine if the sensitivity and specificity can be improved compared with qualitative BI‐RADS descriptors of kinetics. 3D DCE‐MRI data from 100 patients wi
## Abstract Dynamic contrast‐enhanced breast MR imaging was performed on 14 patients (five cancerous lesions, nine benign) with slice‐selective spoiled gradient‐recalled echo (2D SPGR) imaging. Adiabatic saturation recovery __T__~1~ measurements were performed before (__T__~1pre~) and after (__T__~